Stories.
AI can carry more of the work, but it keeps writing the people out of the story. Stories puts them back: engineers, their judgment, and the memory and meaning their teams build around the code.
TL;DRHuman-centered stories about the people behind the code and the judgment AI should not replace.
Stories about the people behind the code
Frequently asked questions
- What are Sigilix stories about?
- The people behind the code: the judgment, memory, and meaning engineering teams keep even as AI carries more of the surrounding work. They argue that speed alone is not the point if it writes the human context out of the work.
- Does Sigilix think AI should replace engineers?
- No. The consistent theme is that AI should take on more of the repeated burden — review, triage, context gathering — so people have more room to decide what should actually ship, not less ownership of the decision.
- How is this different from the research and blog sections?
- Research covers the technical architecture and the blog covers the engineering philosophy. Stories keep the human side in view: why the work matters to the people doing it, and what should stay with them.